To download a PDF of the patent application for TifGrand click here, select Save As
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF X CULTIVARS
ASSOCIATE CULTIVARS
(Please check appropriate type of application)
1. Crop: Interspecific Hybrid Bermudagrass (Cynodon transvaalensis
x C. dactylon)
2. Experimental no. or name:
Tested as 93-92, 94-18, 97-4, 00-07, Tift #4 and ST-5.
3. Pedigree and history: In
1992 we crossed six C. transvaalensis (T572, T573, T573, T574, T575, T576 and T577) parents
with 4
C. dactylon (T90, T110, Quickstand, and VaMont) parents at
4.
Description: In 1993, we classified the selections we made
in the fall of 1993 into very dwarf , dwarf and
Tifway types. ST-5 was in the
dwarf class and therefore our original controls in the 1997 planted test were
Tifdwarf and Tifgreen. St-5 is a naturally darker green and dense grass. It
produces a small seed head on a thin peduncle in late May and June (typical of
bermudagrass, but ST-5 produces slightly more seed heads than desired—the only
negative trait of this cultivar). Seed
heads can be reduced by 50% by using Primo (data not included).
5. Station(s) where
developed:
6. Participating
scientist(s): Wayne Hanna (USDA-ARS and UGA) and Kris Braman (UGA)
7. In what respect is the new cultivar superior to the cultivar
now in use? or reasons for
proposing release as an associate cultivar:
ST-5 has significantly more shade
tolerance than Tifway and TifSport, especially after the first year of
establishment (Table 1). Turf quality
is as good or better than Tifway and
TifSport (Tables 2A, 2B and 6). In most
years, ST-5 tends to produce significantly more
seed
heads than Tifway and TifSport (Table
3), but the number of seed heads can be reduced
by treating with Primo (data not shown).
Plant color for ST-5 is as good
or better than for Tifway or TifSport (Table 4).
In field plots where other grass
cultivar/genotypes are present ST-5 has significantly better tawny
mole cricket resistance
than Tifway or TifSport (Table 5). However, in greenhouse studies under
non-preference ST-5 had higher
mole cricket reproduction values than
did Tifway or TifSport (Table 7B). ST-5
has similar
resistance to the
two-lined spittle bug (Table 7A) and army worm (Table 8) as Tifway, Tifdwarf
and TifSport,, but
less resistance to the bermudagrass mite
(Table 7A). The bermudagrass mite is
mainly a problem on stressed
grass.
Note—Data in tables shown
for years are usually means of multi-ratings.
At
taken monly from April to Oct.
At
herbicides (except for
1 lbs/ac of Atrazine in March). The ‘turf quality’ rating is a general rating
where density, color, texture, pest
resistance , etc are considered for evaluating the desirability of
the turf.
Additionally, ST-5 has been
growing in the following non-replicated
shade situations (Table 1B). It has performed well where the shade is not
more than 70%. After 70%
shade, ST-5 will maintain a turf ,
but it will thin out as the shade increases.
At 95% shade, ST-5 will rate a
3-4 on a scale of 1-9 where 9 is best. Ron Wright
at The County Club of
1. Lawn in
2. Rough on Golf Course of
3. Lawn in
4. Tee on Pinehurst Resort #3, 2 years (Steve Wilson)
5. Rough on Atlanta Athletic Club, 2 years (Ken Mangum
and Jason Harris)
6. Rough on East Lake Golf Club, 2 years (Ralph Kepple)
8. Method of propagation:
Vegetative (sprigs, plugs, stolons, rhizomes and/or sod
9. Amount of breeder seed stocks available
(if applicable): 12 x 12 feet plot
10. Amount of foundation seed stocks available (if applicable): One
acre
11. Amount of cutting or bud
material available for vegetatively propagated material for nursery
distribution (if applicable):
12. Is there likely to be
unusual difficulty encountered in the production of any class of seed
stocks? Explain. No
13. Three suggested names for the cultivar: To be determined
14. Name approved by Plant Cultivar and Germplasrn Release Committee
15. Form of intellectual
property protection: Plant Patent
16. Is a royalty assessment
recommended: X Yes No
Table 1. Response of bermudagrass cultivars to continuous shade.
Test #1. Planted
1999(64 entries)—under 60% continuous shade.
Turf Quality
Cultivar 1999
Tifway 4.1
TifSport 3.9
Tifgreen 3.6
Tifdwarf 3.3
ST-5 5.0
5%LSD 1.0
Test #2-Planted April 2000 (20 entries)-under 60% continuous shade.
Turf Quality
Cultivar 2000 2001
Tifway 5.5 5.3
TifSport 6.0 6.0
ST-5 6.3 7.8
5%LSD 1.6 1.1
Test #3-Planted May 2002 (7 entries)-under 75% continuous
shade.
Turf Quality
Cultivar 2002 2003 2004
Tifway 4.0 4.4 4.5
TifSport 3.8 4.2 4.6
ST-5 6.3 7.8 7.3
5%LSD 1.0 1.1 1.1
|
Table 1B. |
Turf density ratings on ST-5 in
non-replicated tests. |
||||
|
|
Rating |
|
Density (No.Observations)-9=best |
||
|
Location |
Dates |
%Shade |
ST-5 |
Tifway |
|
|
|
Nov. 2007 |
10% |
9(3) |
|
|
|
Plt. May.2002 |
|
50% |
8.3(3) |
|
|
|
Yard |
|
60% |
8.3(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
95% |
3(1) |
|
|
|
|
_____________________________________________________ |
||||
|
|
July.2007 |
55% |
8(1) |
|
|
|
Plt. Mar.2005 |
|
85% |
4(1) |
1(1) |
|
|
Yard |
|
60% |
7(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
0% |
9(1) |
8(1) |
|
|
|
_____________________________________________________ |
||||
|
|
June.2007 |
90% |
8(1) |
4(1) |
|
|
Plt. Mar.2005 |
|
95% |
4(1) |
1(1) |
|
|
Mobile CC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rough. |
_____________________________________________________ |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept.2007 |
90% |
8(1) |
|
6(1) |
|
Plt.July.2006 |
|
(pine trees) |
|
|
|
|
Pinehurst #3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4th Tee |
____________________________________________________ |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. 2007 |
50% |
8(1) |
|
|
|
Plt. Sept.2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Club |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rough |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_____________________________________________________ |
||||
|
|
Sept.2007 |
70% |
7(1) |
4(1) |
|
|
Plt. Sept. 2006 |
|
Little Traffic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70% |
3 to 6(1) |
|
|
|
Rough |
|
High Traffic |
|
|
|
|
__________________________________________________________________ |
|||||
|
Note: %shade reflects the
reduction in photosynthesis light in the |
|||||
|
|
450 to 650 wave length range. |
When appropriate |
|||
|
|
ratings were also made on adjacent
standard cultivars. |
||||
|
Table
2A. Turf quality data on ST-5 triploid turf bermudagrass and standard control
cultivars |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
planted
in |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Cultivar |
|
|
|
|
Turf
Quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Mow Ht. |
→ |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Year
Plant |
→ |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Data
Year |
→ |
1997 |
1998 |
1998 |
1999 |
1999 |
2000 |
2000 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
Tifgreen |
|
|
7 |
5.6 |
6.7 |
4.5 |
4.9 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
Tifdwarf |
|
|
7.5 |
6.2 |
6.6 |
4.9 |
4.6 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
Tifway |
|
|
7.5 |
|
6.9 |
|
6.3 |
|
6.3 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
TifSport |
|
|
7.5 |
|
6.7 |
|
6.7 |
|
7.5 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
ST-5 |
|
|
8.5 |
7.4 |
8 |
6.6 |
7.2 |
6.9 |
6.5 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
LSD-5% |
|
|
0.8 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Note: In
the 1997 planted test, Tifway and TifSport data came from an adjacent test
managed identical |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
to the
ST-5 test except that it was not mowed at 1/4 inch. |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Cultivar |
|
|
|
|
Turf
Quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Mow Ht. |
→ |
1/2 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Year
Plant |
→ |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Data
Year |
→ |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2003 |
2004 |
2004 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Tifdwarf |
|
|
6.6 |
5.3 |
2.8 |
3.7 |
2.9 |
2.1 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Tifway |
|
|
7.2 |
7 |
6.4 |
7.8 |
6.1 |
6.7 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
TifSport |
|
|
7.3 |
6.9 |
6.2 |
7 |
5.6 |
6.2 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
ST-5 |
|
|
7.1 |
6.8 |
7.9 |
6.9 |
6.7 |
7.7 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
LSD-5% |
|
|
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2 |
1.4 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Table
2B. Turf quality data on ST-5 triploid turf bermudagrass and standard
cultivars in |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Cultivar |
|
|
|
Turf
Quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Mow Ht. |
→ |
1/4 inch |
|
1/8 inch |
3/16 inch |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Year
Plant |
→ |
1997A |
|
1997T |
1997T |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Data
Year |
→ |
1997A |
|
1998T |
1998T |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Tifdwarf |
|
|
4.8 |
|
4.2 |
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Tifway |
|
|
5.1 |
|
4.5 |
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
ST-5 |
|
|
6.8 |
|
4.9 |
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
LSD-5% |
|
|
0.7 |
|
0.4 |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Note: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Table
3. Ratings on seed head formation (end of May and June) on ST-5 and standard |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
controls.
(9= many seed heads). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Cultivar |
|
|
|
|
Seed
Heads |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Mow Ht. |
→ |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Year
Plant |
→ |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Data
Year |
→ |
1997 |
1998 |
1998 |
1999 |
1999 |
2000 |
2000 |
|
|||||||||||
|
Tifgreen |
|
|
2.5 |
1 |
3 |
1.7 |
1 |
1.2 |
2 |
|
|||||||||||
|
Tifdwarf |
|
|
1.5 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1 |
|
|||||||||||
|
Tifway |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
TifSport |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
ST-5 |
|
|
3.5 |
3 |
2.5 |
3 |
3.5 |
2.2 |
3.3 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
LSD-5% |
|
|
1.6 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Note: In
the 1997 planting, Tifway and TifSport data came from an adjacent test
managed the same |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
as the
ST-5 test except there was not 1/4 inch mowing height. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Cultivar |
|
|
|
Seed
Heads |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Mow Ht. |
→ |
1/2 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Year
Plant |
→ |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Data
Year |
→ |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2004 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Tifdwarf |
|
|
1.7 |
3.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.7 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Tifway |
|
|
2 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
TifSport |
|
|
2 |
1.7 |
2.3 |
1.3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
ST-5 |
|
|
3.8 |
4.8 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
LSD-5% |
|
|
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Table
4. Ratings for turf color on ST-5 and standard controls at |
|
||||||||||
|
(9=
dark green). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cultivar |
|
|
color |
|
|
|
|
|
Greenup |
|
|
|
|
Mow Ht. |
→ |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
||
|
|
Year
Plant |
→ |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997A |
|
1997 |
1997 |
|
|
|
Data
Year |
→ |
1998 |
1998 |
1999 |
1999 |
1997A |
|
1998 |
1998 |
|
|
Tifgreen |
|
|
5.8 |
7.4 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
4.4 |
|
5.8 |
7.3 |
|
|
Tifdwarf |
|
|
7.3 |
8.2 |
5 |
5 |
5.3 |
|
7.2 |
8.1 |
|
|
Tifway |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TifSport |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ST-5 |
|
|
7.8 |
8.3 |
7 |
6.5 |
7.2 |
|
7.8 |
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSD-5% |
|
|
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.4 |
|
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
Rating on Tifway and TifSport in the 1997 planted test came from an adjacent |
|
|
|||||||||
|
test
managed identical to the ST-5 test except there was no 1/4 inch mowing
height. |
|
||||||||||
|
1997A
data came from AZ collect by Charlie Rodgers. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cultivar |
|
|
Color |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mow Ht. |
→ |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Plant |
→ |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data
Year |
→ |
2001 |
2003 |
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tifdwarf |
|
|
6.8 |
2.8 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tifway |
|
|
7.5 |
6.4 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TifSport |
|
|
7.8 |
6.2 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ST-5 |
|
|
7.8 |
7.9 |
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSD-5% |
|
|
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table
5. Ratings for tawny mole cricket damage on ST-5 and standard controls. |
||||||||
|
(9=major
damage). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cultivar |
|
|
Mole
Crickets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mow Ht. |
→ |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
|
|
Year
Plant |
→ |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
|
|
Data
Year |
→ |
1998 |
1998 |
1999 |
1999 |
2000 |
2000 |
|
Tifgreen |
|
|
4 |
4 |
5.8 |
5.3 |
5.9 |
6.5 |
|
Tifdwarf |
|
|
5 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
5.4 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
|
Tifway |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
2.5 |
|
4.8 |
|
TifSport |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2.3 |
|
2.9 |
|
ST-5 |
|
|
1.3 |
1.8 |
1.3 |
1 |
1.2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSD-5% |
|
|
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
Tifway and TifSport data from the 1997 planting came from an adjacent |
|
|||||||
|
test
managed identical to the ST-5 test except there was no 1/4 inch mowing
height. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cultivar |
|
|
Mole
Crickets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mow Ht. |
→ |
1/2 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
1/4 inch |
1/2 inch |
|
|
Year
Plant |
→ |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
|
|
Data
Year |
→ |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2003 |
2004 |
2004 |
|
Tifdwarf |
|
|
3.3 |
5.3 |
9 |
8.3 |
8.2 |
7.8 |
|
Tifway |
|
|
2 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
2.2 |
2.7 |
|
TifSport |
|
|
2.3 |
2.7 |
5.3 |
3 |
2.7 |
3.4 |
|
ST-5 |
|
|
1.7 |
2 |
1 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSD-5% |
|
|
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
Table 6. Rating for turf quality
on ST-5 and standard |
|
|||
|
controls in the National Turfgrass
Evaluation Trials |
|
|||
|
from 2003-2006 in the
Southeastern, Southwestern |
|
|||
|
and Transition zones (9=best
quality) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turf Quality in Three US Regions (Zones): |
||
|
Cultivar |
Number of: |
Southeast |
Southwest |
Transition |
|
|
States → |
7 |
4 |
8 |
|
|
Locations → |
9 |
5 |
9 |
|
TifSport |
|
6.7 |
6.5 |
6 |
|
Tifway |
|
6.6 |
6.4 |
5.9 |
|
Celebration |
|
6.1 |
6 |
5.7 |
|
Patriot |
|
6.1 |
5.9 |
6.5 |
|
Midlawn |
|
6 |
6.3 |
6.2 |
|
ST-5 |
|
6.6 |
6.2 |
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSD-5% |
|
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 7A. |
Response of ST-5 and commercial
controls to two-lined spittle bugs |
||||||
|
|
and bermudagrass mites in
greenhouse studies under no-choice |
||||||
|
|
conditions (studies conducted by
Kris Braman). |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two-Lined Spittlebug |
Bermudagrass Mite |
|
|
|||
|
|
Mean |
Mean |
% Damage |
Rating |
Rating |
|
|
|
|
Damage |
Number of |
due to |
Expt. A |
Exp. B |
|
|
|
|
Rating |
Nymphs |
Adult |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 30 |
Surviving to |
Feeding |
|
|
|
|
|
Cultivar |
|
Day 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tifway |
0.7 |
0.3 |
31 |
5.6 |
4.8 |
|
|
|
TifSport |
0 |
0.3 |
52 |
4.6 |
4.9 |
|
|
|
Tifdwarf |
0.7 |
0 |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
ST-5 |
1.3 |
0.3 |
47 |
3.7 |
3 |
|
|
|
LSD-5% |
ns |
ns |
ns |
0.7 |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: Higher ratings for
bermudagrass mites mean more resistance. |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 7B. |
Response of ST-5 and commercial
cultivars to tawny mole crickets |
||||||
|
|
in greenhouse studies under no-choice
conditions (studies |
|
|||||
|
|
conducted by Kris Braman). |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tawny Mole Crickets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Root Dry |
No. Eggs |
No. Crickets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight |
After 30 |
After 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Control |
Days |
Days |
|
|
|
|
|
Cultivar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tifway |
52 |
5.2 |
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
TifSport |
67 |
0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tifdwarf |
44 |
7.9 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
ST-5 |
35 |
22 |
|||||